GCP billing LLMjacking
GCP billing-account hijack for LLMjacking: search-ad phishing to cross-tenant Gemini inference at the victim's expense
Posted · Updated · Spectrum Delta Research Team
Summary
Wiz CIRT's incident-response report (Oct 20, A/3) documents multiple observed intrusions in which threat actors hijacked Google Cloud Platform billing accounts to fund unauthorized LLM usage. The chain: Google Search ads on admin terms ('google cloud', 'gcp') led through a Google Sites redirect to a fake Google login that captured credentials AND MFA codes; the kit immediately replayed them for the first malicious login, then the actor re-authenticated from a second IP minutes later. In existing low-usage GCP projects the actor enabled the Gemini API, created service accounts with API keys, and granted roles/ml.admin and roles/mcp.toolUser; deleted the iam.allowedPolicyMemberDomains organization policy; added external Gmail accounts with roles/billing.admin; linked attacker-controlled projects to the victim's billing account (cross-tenant: prompts and outputs stayed in the attacker's tenants, invisible to the victim); demoted legitimate billing admins to viewers; and blended geographically via IPs in the victim's HQ country. Within 24-48 hours victims saw tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars in Gemini API charges (Wiz CIRT, A/3).
Breakdown
Adversary
No actor name or attribution is provided by the primary — the report describes 'threat actors' generically across multiple investigated intrusions
Procedures (4)
Search-ad phishing with MFA capture and immediate replay
Spearphishing via search ad with credential and MFA capture
- T1566.002Phishing: Spearphishing Link
Logs
- Google Workspace User Log Events · Suspicious login flags; anomalous re-authentication triggers
Detectors
No known detector
Click to expand remaining (3) proceduresHide remaining procedures
Gemini API enablement with privileged service-account keys
Additional cloud credentials in dormant projects
- T1098.001Account Manipulation: Additional Cloud Credentials
Logs
GCP Admin Activity audit logs · Gemini API enablement; SA/key creation; org-policy and IAM changes
Detectors
No known detector
Billing takeover via org-policy removal and external grants
Billing-account takeover: guardrail removal and external control
- T1098Account Manipulation
Logs
GCP Admin Activity audit logs · Gemini API enablement; SA/key creation; org-policy and IAM changes
Detectors
No known detector
Unauthorized LLM inference at the victim's expense
Resource hijacking: LLM inference billed to the victim
- T1496Resource Hijacking
Logs
Cloud Billing audit logs / cost export · Billing-account role changes; project linkage; cost surges above baseline
Detectors
No known detector
Indicators of compromise
Hunt only
(Wiz CIRT (https://www.wiz.io/blog/from-phishing-to-llmjacking), A/3) — initial-login IP 212.73.134[.]136; phishing domains (17 per the primary's IOC table): gboogl[.]com, groosl[.]com, gprokl[.]com, gxoosl[.]com, gsoolg[.]com, gwoogl[.]com, gzoozl[.]com, groonl[.]com, gsool[.]space, gbrokl[.]space, gbrokl[.]xyz, gsoosl[.]xyz, gsool[.]xyz, gpoosl[.]com, groolg[.]com, gcslom[.]com, gcoalg[.]com (all wildcard-prefixed); the second IP used for subsequent activity is NOT provided by the primary; no project names or identifiers provided. Assessed 2026-10-24, hunt-only — the phishing kit domains are perishable attacker infrastructure and the kit IP may rotate; the durable hunt value is the behavioral chain in GCP audit logs, not these indicators.
Detailed
IP: 212.73.134[.]136 (initial kit login; the second IP for subsequent activity is not disclosed). Phishing domains (17, wildcard-prefixed per the primary's IOC table): gboogl[.]com, groosl[.]com, gprokl[.]com, gxoosl[.]com, gsoolg[.]com, gwoogl[.]com, gzoozl[.]com, groonl[.]com, gsool[.]space, gbrokl[.]space, gbrokl[.]xyz, gsoosl[.]xyz, gsool[.]xyz, gpoosl[.]com, groolg[.]com, gcslom[.]com, gcoalg[.]com. Roles observed: roles/ml.admin, roles/mcp.toolUser (service accounts), roles/recommender.billingAccountCudAdmin (projects), roles/billing.admin (billing accounts). Organization policy deleted: iam.allowedPolicyMemberDomains. Project names: not disclosed (existing low-usage victim projects; external actor-controlled projects). Charges: tens to hundreds of thousands of USD within 24-48h. All from the primary (Wiz CIRT (https://www.wiz.io/blog/from-phishing-to-llmjacking), A/3), assessed 2026-10-24, hunt-only.
Sources
- A/3Wiz CIRT: From Phishing to LLMjacking (primary)
- B/3CSA research note: Cloud Billing Hijacking as LLMjacking (companion analysis)
- B/3DevelopersIO: Wiz CIRT LLMjacking report walkthrough (companion analysis)
Grades are source reliability (A–F) and information credibility (1–6).
Questions, detections or sightings of GCP billing LLMjacking? Bring them to the community.
Discuss in the Tradecraft Slack